Tuesday, November 22, 2011

Fighting Global Warming for $1 Day. . . and Still Live Comfortably

“Fight Global Warming for $1 a Day. . .and Still Live Comfortably,” was a great article written by Mike Tidwell in 2002.  He provides a detailed, informative example for those who live in North America on how they can individually take steps to combat global warming as reported by the United Nations report on climate change in 2001.  He was very passionate about this subject and methodically presented the information so that, if convinced, others could follow his lead in making their homes energy efficient by reducing the demand on electricity and natural gas. Mr. Tidwell supported his claim with perfect examples and also revealed sources of different organizations and companies that support home energy saving solutions.
                    
Although this article was well written, it was printed during a time of false prosperity and in an era when it was attractive to acquire a home equity loan. Taking out a loan for $7,500 that will take 10 years to pay off is a deterrent to most Americans today. Unfortunately, with budget cuts to most government programs and charitable organizations’ experiencing stagnant growth or even suffering with the ability to sustain their existence, the article is outdated and thus loses some of its appeal to the average American. What if the homeowner lives in a Home Owner Association (HOA) community? His approach is not feasible when the  restrictions imposed by most HOAs are considered. Many citizens would find Tidwell’s methods interesting, but out of reach. It is possible that Mike Tidwell was overly excited and exaggerated his presentation to make the average American consider his methods of saving energy. 

Yet, there are simple alternatives that can result in savings and a reduction of individual energy footprints.  Reducing the number of heating/cooling units in operation, using ceiling fans, lighting with long-life, compact fluorescent light bulbs and recycling paper and plastic are a few ways to begin affordable participation in energy conservation and improving the environment. 

Tidwell is to be applauded for his conscientious efforts to fight global warming. He is dedicated to this cause and shares his experience warmly.  His article does bring awareness to a problem that will affect the future of the planet, and more importantly, our children and grandchildren.  Perhaps this article should inspire everyone to be more intentional about doing their part, no matter how large or small, to combat climate change.

Tuesday, November 15, 2011

No to Budget Cuts in Higher Education

           The essay written by freshman student, Elizabeth Medina remains very relevant today.  Most employers  require a degree to obtain employment sufficient to meet the needs of families. Parents are desperate for their children to see higher education that they were not afforded.  However, it remains financially unattainable for many due to the recession unless students are willing to take on more debt, which will probably aggravate the country’s economic woes.              Elizabeth Medina gives a very good statistical report of the toll that an increase education will make on students. The services that could be lost as a result of proposed increases of higher education will be detrimental to the surrounding communities.  The trickle down affect is clearly stated.  Giving students a solid foundation now should be important to the legislators of this state.  It is an investment that will pay great dividends in the future and it should be put to a vote by ballot so that the will of populace has some input in the decision as opposed to being dictated by the state legislative body. 
            The government was put in place to protect its citizens, but it appears that the politicians have again taken on a matter that will leave its citizens defenseless and vulnerable.  All Georgians will regret the lack of investment in our educators and our children if lawmakers cannot identify viable alternatives to increasing the cost of higher education. 

A Modest Proposal

                                                                           The poem ‘A Modest Proposal’, written by Jonathan Swift in 1729 was a form of sharp satire pointing out the problem of widespread poverty and a lack of action on the part of the monarchy.  The poem itself was a bit melancholy. However, he manages to assert his disdain for certain religious groups as well as presenting a morbidly detailed plan of action for consideration by the ruling party and the wealthy of Ireland.
             Swift’s descriptive reference of mothers as breeders, children as bastards, beggars and delectable food was deplorable.  He referred to the poor who were elderly and maimed as encumbrance.  All of his ‘thoughts’ were weird and well thought out as offered through his calculating plans of cannibalism. To think that those that engaged in deep conversation with Swift about his inhuman feelings was mind boggling, and yet he managed to do so.
       
The sarcastic views of Swift could be totally lost on the reader if not identified in paragraph 29 of the text.  He was surely among the wealthy at that time, and was concerned about the lack of sympathy or help provided to those that had fallen on hard times. He wanted more to be done to help the less fortunate; however, were much better means to voice concerns to a country that was facing these problems during that era? There appeared to be an utter disregard for the poor on the part of the elite.

            Swift’s calculations were cold and his offer to kill at minimum a hundred and twenty thousand babies to ultimately feed the rich by being roasted alive and presented on the table for carving should have been shocking to most citizens of that country.  As part of his personal release from his barbaric suggestions, he was conveniently able to exclude himself from the activity by sharing the fact that his daughter was passed the age of slaughter and his wife was passed child-bearing age.  We wonder if the proposal would be acceptable to those that had the audacity to consider such activity if there were no exemptions?

Tuesday, November 8, 2011

Why Schools Don't Educate

John Taylor Gatto uses very strong adjectives in his speech written as a recipient of a surely well-deserved award.  Gatto presented his information very well from beginning to end and it was based on facts as well as his opinions.  It seemed that he was very passionate about the subject of educating youth and this helped to engage the readers.  The piece was personal due to his dedication as a former teacher and the information presented was observed by him on a daily basis.  He made a great comparison on the contrast of school and television and the influences of each on children.

Society has become self indulged, focused on commercialism that promotes instant gratification.  The pathologies presented were excellent. Children have become detached from their surroundings because of excessive television viewing, which has the power to promote, suggest, and instill behavior that society has accepted as the norm.  Unfortunately, the lack of experience during adolescence with real charity, real adventures or searching for real mentors as he speaks of in the first paragraph is sadly true for most children today.  It will take innovation and dialogue on the part of parents and passionate educators to fill this void if this country wants an outcome of productive, well-rounded adults in the future.  What happened to educational field trips?  This was an effective approach in the past and augmented the education of our children.
The life of busy working parents and the lack resources for educators has a dismal effect on how children are reared and the time dedicated by all to ensuring a solid education and overall childhood experience.  Think of how this must affect our teachers who spend a minimum of four years in college to obtain a job that does not promote wealth or the real power to make decisions around the methods used to have a better impact on the education of youth.

So, why should students commit so much time in school? American adults spend so much of our time to television and the media that the children are only replicating what they see us do. We need to change first. Gatto is right, we are to blame!!

Girls Will Be Girls

          Ellen Goodman’s article, ‘Girls Will Be Girls,’ written in 2002 for a nationally syndicated column, addresses issues that are in the forefront of today’s society.  The sarcastic introduction of the article was a great way to get the reader’s attention and to lead into the rest of the text. She puts in perspective the actions of ‘RMG’s (Really Mean Girls) that have recently made their way to the mainstream media.  Goodman accurately points out that it is viewed and described differently if similar actions are conducted by boys.  Ellen Goodman simply points out that boys and girls are the same. It is an act of bullying no matter how the story is told.  Cattiness, backbiting, jealousy and contentiousness are just a few terms to describe the behavior that Ms. Goodman is referring to for girls and almost every girl has experienced this in one form or another.
Goodman relates the seriousness of mean girls to Columbine killings.  Although the aftermath of mean girls has not reached the level of Columbine physically, mentally it can have long lasting effects and some girls have taken their lives for what may appear as a diminutive issue.  Really mean girls is not a new phenomenon. 
No one should ever resign themselves to being bullied as a child.  Nothing is inevitable unless you sit back and allow it!  Parents have an obligation to intervene when this activity becomes over the top, whether their child is a victim of RMG’s or has chosen to be a mean girl.  On the other hand, somehow it seems to have resulted in adults with strong character if they were able to survive the ostracizing and isolation intended by the bully.
            We did not see the finale of the sitcom Ally McBeal, but she always seemed to have fought battles in her mind.  She never allowed her surroundings to dictate to her mentally, although she never fought physically. Go Ally! And sometimes life brings about positive change...

Monday, October 31, 2011

Indirectness Is Not Insecurity

     This excerpt from the book, "Talk from 9 to 5: How Women’s and Men’s Conversational Styles Affect Who Gets Heard, Who Gets Credit, and What Gets Done at Work," written by Deborah Tannen, implies that an indirect or soft approach to issuing directions in the workplace may solicit a better response than a direct command. She provides an example of a directive issued by a male manager to a female employee and a second example of a detailed conversation between a female manager, whose style of delivering a directive is notably ‘softer’, and a male subordinate.  Ms. Tannen supports an indirect approach that offers employees an opportunity to make a decision to accept a command cloaked as suggestion.  
     The tone of the text suggests that male managers are more direct in communicating instructions in the workplace, and that female managers negotiate with employees to accomplish objectives.  Nothing could be further from the truth.  Many women in management positions feel the have to prove themselves to their male counterparts and, therefore, take a firm posture when dealing with subordinates.  The example of a ‘soft touch’ management style is often ineffective.  Who do you know that has the luxury of debating with a boss over the content of assignments, male or female?  This kind of exchange can be perceived as insubordinate behavior.  Even if appropriate justification is offered, generally an employee is not allowed the liberty to engage in a lengthy challenge to a request made in the workplace
What about employees who have a tendency to take advantage of managers that exhibit a soft management?  Who wins when poor work ethic is discovered the workplace relationship is broken?.  The manager is now forced to move to a more rigid style of management, productivity is affected and you have an unhappy employee. 
     Ms. Tannen’s writing offers a perspective from the manager and employee standpoint.  Although she spends much more time presenting the example of indirect management, she offers a contrasting opinion in paragraph five by stating, “Some people will find Mark’s direct commands more appropriate; others would find them abrasive.  Some would find Kristen’s indirect directives congenial; others would find them irritating.”  Her position on the issue is obvious as the reader considers the positive comments made toward the conversation between the ‘soft touch’ manager and her subordinate.  Ms. Tannen is very critical of the possible perception that managers with a direct approach may have to a ‘softer’ style.  She states, “People with direct styles of asking others to do things perceive indirect requests as manipulative—if they perceive them as requests at all.  But “manipulative” is often just a way of blaming others for our discomfort with their styles.”  The examples discounting manipulative behavior are noted to convince the readers of her assumptions and personal interpretation. 
     In the end, addressing employees with respect does add great value to the workplace and keeps organizations in compliance with labor laws.  Without question, managerial suggestions with solid feedback from subordinates could offer professional growth for the employee and maybe the manager as well.  Unfortunately, it is probably the exception, not the rule.

A Deadly Education

T. Leigh Maxwell, a student at Clayton State University (CSU), wrote a very thorough, thought-provoking essay on the effects of secondhand smoke in March 2010.  She emphasizes the fact that Clayton State along with many other institutions of higher learning has ignored this issue and the statistics and factual information presented was impressive.  Ms. Maxwell points outs that although CSU does have a smoking ban policy, it is woefully insufficient and does not protect the health and human rights of non-smokers navigating from building to building on campus. In fact, the essay contains quotes from various reports, both governmental and private research, that imply that the toxins in exhaled smoke are extremely harmful, not only to the smoker, but to the innocent non-smoker and raise the risk of contracting any manner of disease that can ultimately lead to death.
She is careful to offer the opposing point of view, but quickly discounts their interpretation of a harmless nature secondhand smoke with information from a reliable and respected source.  By listing Georgia as a state that bans smoking in all restaurants and government buildings, she supports the statement, “Consequently, it is hard to understand why Georgia’s state universities lag behind on the issue of total smoking bands.”
Most agree that smoking is a nasty, self-destructive habit and with the information on the negative effects one does wonder why a person would make the choice to continue.  Granted, smokers have civil and social rights, but non-smokers have a right to a smoke-free environment and to object when that right is violated.  The government is expected to generate legislative issues that affect and protect the majority of its citizens.  Issues that involve the possibility of harm or eventual death deserves attention and the intervention of our elected officials; at minimum a vote by the people and in Ms. Maxwell’s case the student body of CSU.